It looks as though the rumors about Morgan setting his sights on a new lady just might come true. Morgan Corinthos and Dr. Britt Westbourne have yet to really cross paths in Port Charles. However, actor Bryan Craig (Morgan Corinthos) and actress Kelly Thiebaud (Britt Westbourne) have been an item in real life for quite some time.
The fans have been asking when Britt and Morgan would, if ever, have scenes together. Looks like wishes are about to come true.
Is it possible that these two will have a budding romance, or will Morgan just be a pawn in Dr. Obrecht’s little game to get Britt back with Nikolas?
In a recent Daytime Confidential interview, Bryan Craig gave a little insight on what fans can expect for Morgan and Britt. He said, “They’re doing things to bring our characters closer and closer to meeting. She’s running into people I’m related to and vice versa, so it could happen. We honestly don’t know. We hope it does.
The Fluke saga has been an ongoing mystery that we have been trying to solve for many months. We know that the real Luke Spencer has been drugged and locked up at miscavige where the crazy Heather Webber was institutionalized. Someone “stole” Luke’s face and is running around Port Charles living Luke’s life. He has interjected himself into Luke’s love life with Tracy, his family life with Lulu and Dante, and he is getting close to long time friend of Luke, Sonny Corinthos. Fluke is manipulating everyone in town, especially Tracy. Fluke is in this to take down Sonny and to get his hands on ELQ.
There are still many missing pieces to this puzzle, but some seem to be coming together rather nicely. Who has been ruthless and crazy with no limitations of what he is capable of ? Jerry Jacks. He has committed some completely erratic crimes in Port Charles. We know Jerry is still alive because the last time we saw him he had Bobbie held hostage on top of the Metro Court. Why was he there holding Bobbie hostage? Well because LUKE stole his cure for polonium poisoning. There is motive right there. How is Jerry Jacks involved with Julian? Well when Jerry and Luke were fighting on top pf the Metro court, we saw Jerry fall, but we also saw him get rescued and driven away by Julian Jerome.
Now… how does this tie in with the obnoxious newcomer Maxie brought back with her? Levi is an Aussie. Jerry Jacks is an Aussie. Big connection possibility right there. Levi is manipulative and deceitful and he is trying to get his mitts involved with sabotaging ELQ, just like Fluke. Could Levi be Jerry’s son? Levi quite possibly be using Maxie as his ticket into the lives of the residents in Port Charles. Inching his way into situations he doesn’t belong, he is causing trouble for everyone. On today’s episode of GH, Levi convinced Maxie to protest with him where Michael, Morgan, and Kiki are preparing for the revival of the new ELQ Brownstone project. In conversation, Maxie brought up Jerry Jacks to Levi. That right there seems like a hint that there is a connection between the two Australians. Rumor has it that Levi is muc more sinister than we could ever imagine… not a far stretch from being related to the evil Jerry Jacks.
SHARE this post if you think Fluke is Jerry Jacks and Levi is connected to Jerry.
What if? That is a question General Hospital fans are constantly asking themselves and other fans on a daily basis. Social media is filled with fans eager to get to the bottom of General Hospital’s newest daytime drama. Lucky for us there are many things going on at once, keeping those wheels turning.
When we take a look at the current story line involving Patrick and Sabrina’s car accident, there are many characters to evaluate in order to try and figure out who ran them off the road. So far there was Britt, who showed up right at that moment but was cleared of any suspicion, there is Levi, who we have yet to figure out a purpose for being in Port Charles, we also have troubled Rafe, and now we have Silas, whose car was named to be the car that caused the accident when Sam and Patrick pulled up the mechanic’s files. Since we know it’s most likely not Silas, perhaps Rafe borrowed his car, and caused the accident. That result would be pretty cut and dry and what we see is what we get. But… WHAT IF?
What if Nina set this entire thing in motion? What if her resentment for Silas runs so deep that she is crazy enough to set him up like this? Nina may have set up Silas, and Rafe may actually be blamed because of his recent drug use and poor decision making. In today’s episode of GH, Nina’s physical therapist made the observation that she isn’t too fond of her husband, Silas. Nina responded with a very sinister grin and replied, “You have no idea.” That being said, it leads us to believe that Nina has a lot more up her sleeve when it comes to tarnishing Silas’ image. Not only is she trying to ruin his relationship with Sam, it seems like she is trying to ruin his life in general.
Do you think Nina has set up Silas and Rafe will end up taking the fall? Comment below and let us know how you think this will all unravel.
Sam the Private Investigator and friend Patrick Drake are on the case to find the individual responsible for Sabrina and Patrick’s accident. As a result of the accident, Sabrona went into very premature labor and baby Gabriel passed away just shortly after he was born. Sabrina left Port Charles to be with her cousin Juan Santiago and family in Puerto Rico in order to deal with the grief of her loss. Patrick, a distraught Father, is sticking around PC and is determined to find the person who did this to his family.
Lately there has been a lot of speculation on who could have caused the accident. The writers have been making it look a lot like it was Rafe, and some fans thought that it was too obvious. Others suspected Nina, since she can walk and all, why not drive too? They also suspected Levi because well, no one is really sure what that creep is up to and doing in Port Charles.
But according to an article in Soap Opera Digest, it has been revealed that the person who caused the accident is in deed Rafe! The writers wanted to incorporate the story with the drug trafficing that has been going on with Fluke and the Jerome family. Head Writer Ron Carlivati commented on the drug use in Port Charles, he said, “With the influx of drugs in town, we thought that someone should be doing them, and Rafe drew the short straw.”
There have been a lot of fans asking about one particular character that has been a fan favorite since the 90s. Social media sites are flooded with fans assuming that the return of one of their favorite characters is now underway.
General Hospital in the 90s was one of the greatest times in the show’s history. There was Robin and Stone, Jason, AJ, Karen and Jagger, Sonny and Brenda, Lily, Miguel, and more. It was an exciting time for the youth because a lot of the main focus were on the high school aged teens like Brenda, Karen, Robin, Stone, and Jason.
So which fan favorite of the 90s is said to be making a comeback?
Now there hasn’t been any confirmation from ABC or the Executives over at General Hospital, but there has been a lot of talk that Vanessa Marcil will be headed back to Port Charles this Summer to reprise her role as the beautiful Brenda Barrett.
Fans are already speculating and romanticizing a story for their beloved Brenda. Many want her to claim her man (Sonny), while teaming up with Carly to take Ava down. Now wouldn’t that be interesting?! Carly and Brenda on the same side! Others want Jax to make a come back as well. With all the talk of Fluke being Harlan Barrett, fans have also theorized that Brenda will make her comeback when the identity of Fluke is revealed. If you are ready for Brenda to return to Port Charles, comment below with your perfect scenario story line involving Brenda!
General Hospital Blog will keep fans updated on any confirmation of this news.
Tony Geary recently let fans in on his personal life as well as the life of GH icon Luke Spencer in a fantastic interview with TV Guide. Geary touched on everything from his role(s) on GH to his real life recent health issue.
Although Tony Geary is not permitted to disclose who “Fluke” actually is, he mentioned that he will be back on screen in October after recovering from back surgery he had in April. Tony stated that the recovery was different than he expected and that it took him two weeks just to walk again. A lot of hard work and physical therapy is involved in his recovery which prohibited him from coming back to General Hospital at the time her initially anticipated.
We all know what a great talent Tony Geary is and has been on General Hospital for 36 years. In recent years he explains that he had felt that the writing for his character wasn’t exactly letting his abilities shine, which got him thinking he might want to let go of Luke altogether and leave the show. He says that the Fluke story enables him to go to a dark place in his acting and since Luke Spencer isn’t a sociopath, he has to be someone else. “Doing Fluke has been a real cleansing after all my years of complaining and wondering what happened to Luke’s black hat. To be able to take something this far and this dark has been a real joy after 36 years. Of course, we had to do it with a different character, since Luke is not a sociopath,” Geary stated. It’s obvious that Tony Geary is very happy with Ron Carlivati’s work and grateful for this Fluke story line. In the interview he laughs and says, “That name (Fluke) started on the Internet and now they actually put it in the scripts!”
A lot of time and effort went into this new side of Luke, aka Fluke, and to play him so flawlessly didn’t come without hard work and dedication. Geary took time to research sociopaths and built the persona from there. Everything from slowed speech and differences in the pitch of his voice had to be altered. His personality is quite shocking as well. Geary makes light of the fact that Fluke is such a pervert. It’s nice that the cast members can all find humor in the way this role is written regarding his forward passes at the women of Port Charles. Since Kiki is Flukes main focus in town when it comes to being suave with the ladies, he stated that Kristen Anderson took a little time to get used to playing opposite his character.
It seems as though things are going very well health wise and career wise for Tony. The fact that he didn’t walk away from his 36 year role as Luke is such a blessing to the fans. What would General Hospital be without Lucas Lorenzo Spencer anyways? We are very thankful the writers could come up with a story that could peak Geary’s interest and that is able to show his multifaceted talents. We look forward to seeing more of Fluke Skyping with Tracy, and for Geary’s full time return this October.
For the full TV Guide interview with Tony Geary (Luke Spencer/Fluke), please visit their website at www.tvguide.com
The newest rumor flying around the General Hospital fan media is that Elizabeth sees the dead… or not so dead. Rumor has it that she is either going crazy to think she is seeing people who have been thought to be dead, or she actually sees these people. Supposedly there will be three.
The question is, who could they be? Some names have been thrown out there and these are just a few the fans came up with… Jason, Ric, AJ. However, if one of them she sees is Jason whom we know is coming back to GH, (Billy Miller), it might make sense that the other two are possible Stavros and Helena. After all, Victor Cassadine needed Robin’s help to bring some Cassadine’s back from there cryogenic state.
If this rumor ends up being true, and Liz is about to see three people she thought were dead, who do you think they would be? Comment below with your guesses!
Fans are anxious to find out who in fact is Julian’s real mob boss but this story has taken the long road. They want to know who has Luke Spencer’s face. It looks like fans won’t catch a break any time soon, so don’t hold your breath because it is going to be quite a while before General Hospital reveals the true identity of Fluke.
According to Soap Opera Digest, Rick Hearst (Ric Lansing) is not taping any scenes for GH at this time. According to the article, Ric Lansing won’t be seen in Port Charles for a long time while. “With Ric in the Witness Protection program, a GH rep confirms that the character will be off the canvas for the foreseeable future.”
Soap Opera Digest also reminds fans that Tony Geary (Luke Spencer) is on hiatus for the majority of the Summer and is also not taping any scenes at this time.
With Hearst and Geary off the canvas for the next few months, it isn’t likely that Julian’s boss will come to light and be taken down without their presence. It looks as though GH won’t make this revelation until at least the Fall.
Ever since Maxie brought Levi to Port Charles back from her soul searching journey, he has been nothing short of controlling, sneaky, and down right annoying. He is obviously manipulating Maxie. There is some reason that Levi doesn’t want Maxie to be with her daughter Georgie. We all know that he was the one who told the judge that Nathan lied to protect her. When he made that phone call, he conveniently lost his Aussie accent. The question is, does he even have an Aussie accent at all, or did he drop his accent to disguise his voice when giving his anonymous tip to the court? Maybe he isn’t from Australia at all and perhaps he only is pretending he is to get in better with Mac. Regardless, Levi is definitely up to something. Who is he connected to? What does he want in Port Charles, and why is he deliberately sabotaging Maxie’s chances with baby Georgie?
Honestly I haven’t seen this much hype over a General Hospital hottie since Antonio Sabato Jr. played Jagger Cates back in the 90s! S o here you go Nathan West fans! Some good eye candy to get you through until tomorrow’s General Hospital.
Terms and Conditions
Welcome to General Hospital Blog!
These terms and conditions outline the rules and regulations for the use of General Hospital Blog's Website, located at https://www.generalhospitalblog.com/.
By accessing this website we assume you accept these terms and conditions. Do not continue to use General Hospital Blog if you do not agree to take all of the terms and conditions stated on this page.
The following terminology applies to these Terms and Conditions, Privacy Statement and Disclaimer Notice and all Agreements: "Client", "You" and "Your" refers to you, the person log on this website and compliant to the Company’s terms and conditions. "The Company", "Ourselves", "We", "Our" and "Us", refers to our Company. "Party", "Parties", or "Us", refers to both the Client and ourselves. All terms refer to the offer, acceptance and consideration of payment necessary to undertake the process of our assistance to the Client in the most appropriate manner for the express purpose of meeting the Client’s needs in respect of provision of the Company’s stated services, in accordance with and subject to, prevailing law of Netherlands. Any use of the above terminology or other words in the singular, plural, capitalization and/or he/she or they, are taken as interchangeable and therefore as referring to same.
Cookies
We employ the use of cookies. By accessing General Hospital Blog, you agreed to use cookies in agreement with the General Hospital Blog's Privacy Policy.
Most interactive websites use cookies to let us retrieve the user’s details for each visit. Cookies are used by our website to enable the functionality of certain areas to make it easier for people visiting our website. Some of our affiliate/advertising partners may also use cookies.
License
Unless otherwise stated, General Hospital Blog and/or its licensors own the intellectual property rights for all material on General Hospital Blog. All intellectual property rights are reserved. You may access this from General Hospital Blog for your own personal use subjected to restrictions set in these terms and conditions.
You must not:
Republish material from General Hospital Blog
Sell, rent or sub-license material from General Hospital Blog
Reproduce, duplicate or copy material from General Hospital Blog
Redistribute content from General Hospital Blog
This Agreement shall begin on the date hereof. Our Terms and Conditions were created with the help of the Terms and Conditions Generator.
Parts of this website offer an opportunity for users to post and exchange opinions and information in certain areas of the website. General Hospital Blog does not filter, edit, publish or review Comments prior to their presence on the website. Comments do not reflect the views and opinions of General Hospital Blog,its agents and/or affiliates. Comments reflect the views and opinions of the person who post their views and opinions. To the extent permitted by applicable laws, General Hospital Blog shall not be liable for the Comments or for any liability, damages or expenses caused and/or suffered as a result of any use of and/or posting of and/or appearance of the Comments on this website.
General Hospital Blog reserves the right to monitor all Comments and to remove any Comments which can be considered inappropriate, offensive or causes breach of these Terms and Conditions.
You warrant and represent that:
You are entitled to post the Comments on our website and have all necessary licenses and consents to do so;
The Comments do not invade any intellectual property right, including without limitation copyright, patent or trademark of any third party;
The Comments do not contain any defamatory, libelous, offensive, indecent or otherwise unlawful material which is an invasion of privacy
The Comments will not be used to solicit or promote business or custom or present commercial activities or unlawful activity.
You hereby grant General Hospital Blog a non-exclusive license to use, reproduce, edit and authorize others to use, reproduce and edit any of your Comments in any and all forms, formats or media.
Hyperlinking to our Content
The following organizations may link to our Website without prior written approval:
Government agencies;
Search engines;
News organizations;
Online directory distributors may link to our Website in the same manner as they hyperlink to the Websites of other listed businesses; and
System wide Accredited Businesses except soliciting non-profit organizations, charity shopping malls, and charity fundraising groups which may not hyperlink to our Web site.
These organizations may link to our home page, to publications or to other Website information so long as the link: (a) is not in any way deceptive; (b) does not falsely imply sponsorship, endorsement or approval of the linking party and its products and/or services; and (c) fits within the context of the linking party’s site.
We may consider and approve other link requests from the following types of organizations:
commonly-known consumer and/or business information sources;
dot.com community sites;
associations or other groups representing charities;
online directory distributors;
internet portals;
accounting, law and consulting firms; and
educational institutions and trade associations.
We will approve link requests from these organizations if we decide that: (a) the link would not make us look unfavorably to ourselves or to our accredited businesses; (b) the organization does not have any negative records with us; (c) the benefit to us from the visibility of the hyperlink compensates the absence of General Hospital Blog; and (d) the link is in the context of general resource information.
These organizations may link to our home page so long as the link: (a) is not in any way deceptive; (b) does not falsely imply sponsorship, endorsement or approval of the linking party and its products or services; and (c) fits within the context of the linking party’s site.
If you are one of the organizations listed in paragraph 2 above and are interested in linking to our website, you must inform us by sending an e-mail to General Hospital Blog. Please include your name, your organization name, contact information as well as the URL of your site, a list of any URLs from which you intend to link to our Website, and a list of the URLs on our site to which you would like to link. Wait 2-3 weeks for a response.
Approved organizations may hyperlink to our Website as follows:
By use of our corporate name; or
By use of the uniform resource locator being linked to; or
By use of any other description of our Website being linked to that makes sense within the context and format of content on the linking party’s site.
No use of General Hospital Blog's logo or other artwork will be allowed for linking absent a trademark license agreement.
iFrames
Without prior approval and written permission, you may not create frames around our Webpages that alter in any way the visual presentation or appearance of our Website.
Content Liability
We shall not be hold responsible for any content that appears on your Website. You agree to protect and defend us against all claims that is rising on your Website. No link(s) should appear on any Website that may be interpreted as libelous, obscene or criminal, or which infringes, otherwise violates, or advocates the infringement or other violation of, any third party rights.
Your Privacy
Please read Privacy Policy
Reservation of Rights
We reserve the right to request that you remove all links or any particular link to our Website. You approve to immediately remove all links to our Website upon request. We also reserve the right to amen these terms and conditions and it’s linking policy at any time. By continuously linking to our Website, you agree to be bound to and follow these linking terms and conditions.
Removal of links from our website
If you find any link on our Website that is offensive for any reason, you are free to contact and inform us any moment. We will consider requests to remove links but we are not obligated to or so or to respond to you directly.
We do not ensure that the information on this website is correct, we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy; nor do we promise to ensure that the website remains available or that the material on the website is kept up to date.
Disclaimer
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, we exclude all representations, warranties and conditions relating to our website and the use of this website. Nothing in this disclaimer will:
limit or exclude our or your liability for death or personal injury;
limit or exclude our or your liability for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation;
limit any of our or your liabilities in any way that is not permitted under applicable law; or
exclude any of our or your liabilities that may not be excluded under applicable law.
The limitations and prohibitions of liability set in this Section and elsewhere in this disclaimer: (a) are subject to the preceding paragraph; and (b) govern all liabilities arising under the disclaimer, including liabilities arising in contract, in tort and for breach of statutory duty.
As long as the website and the information and services on the website are provided free of charge, we will not be liable for any loss or damage of any nature.