Sam the Private Investigator and friend Patrick Drake are on the case to find the individual responsible for Sabrina and Patrick’s accident. As a result of the accident, Sabrona went into very premature labor and baby Gabriel passed away just shortly after he was born. Sabrina left Port Charles to be with her cousin Juan Santiago and family in Puerto Rico in order to deal with the grief of her loss. Patrick, a distraught Father, is sticking around PC and is determined to find the person who did this to his family.
Lately there has been a lot of speculation on who could have caused the accident. The writers have been making it look a lot like it was Rafe, and some fans thought that it was too obvious. Others suspected Nina, since she can walk and all, why not drive too? They also suspected Levi because well, no one is really sure what that creep is up to and doing in Port Charles.
But according to an article in Soap Opera Digest, it has been revealed that the person who caused the accident is in deed Rafe! The writers wanted to incorporate the story with the drug trafficing that has been going on with Fluke and the Jerome family. Head Writer Ron Carlivati commented on the drug use in Port Charles, he said, “With the influx of drugs in town, we thought that someone should be doing them, and Rafe drew the short straw.”
There have been a lot of fans asking about one particular character that has been a fan favorite since the 90s. Social media sites are flooded with fans assuming that the return of one of their favorite characters is now underway.
General Hospital in the 90s was one of the greatest times in the show’s history. There was Robin and Stone, Jason, AJ, Karen and Jagger, Sonny and Brenda, Lily, Miguel, and more. It was an exciting time for the youth because a lot of the main focus were on the high school aged teens like Brenda, Karen, Robin, Stone, and Jason.
So which fan favorite of the 90s is said to be making a comeback?
Now there hasn’t been any confirmation from ABC or the Executives over at General Hospital, but there has been a lot of talk that Vanessa Marcil will be headed back to Port Charles this Summer to reprise her role as the beautiful Brenda Barrett.
Fans are already speculating and romanticizing a story for their beloved Brenda. Many want her to claim her man (Sonny), while teaming up with Carly to take Ava down. Now wouldn’t that be interesting?! Carly and Brenda on the same side! Others want Jax to make a come back as well. With all the talk of Fluke being Harlan Barrett, fans have also theorized that Brenda will make her comeback when the identity of Fluke is revealed. If you are ready for Brenda to return to Port Charles, comment below with your perfect scenario story line involving Brenda!
General Hospital Blog will keep fans updated on any confirmation of this news.
Tony Geary recently let fans in on his personal life as well as the life of GH icon Luke Spencer in a fantastic interview with TV Guide. Geary touched on everything from his role(s) on GH to his real life recent health issue.
Although Tony Geary is not permitted to disclose who “Fluke” actually is, he mentioned that he will be back on screen in October after recovering from back surgery he had in April. Tony stated that the recovery was different than he expected and that it took him two weeks just to walk again. A lot of hard work and physical therapy is involved in his recovery which prohibited him from coming back to General Hospital at the time her initially anticipated.
We all know what a great talent Tony Geary is and has been on General Hospital for 36 years. In recent years he explains that he had felt that the writing for his character wasn’t exactly letting his abilities shine, which got him thinking he might want to let go of Luke altogether and leave the show. He says that the Fluke story enables him to go to a dark place in his acting and since Luke Spencer isn’t a sociopath, he has to be someone else. “Doing Fluke has been a real cleansing after all my years of complaining and wondering what happened to Luke’s black hat. To be able to take something this far and this dark has been a real joy after 36 years. Of course, we had to do it with a different character, since Luke is not a sociopath,” Geary stated. It’s obvious that Tony Geary is very happy with Ron Carlivati’s work and grateful for this Fluke story line. In the interview he laughs and says, “That name (Fluke) started on the Internet and now they actually put it in the scripts!”
A lot of time and effort went into this new side of Luke, aka Fluke, and to play him so flawlessly didn’t come without hard work and dedication. Geary took time to research sociopaths and built the persona from there. Everything from slowed speech and differences in the pitch of his voice had to be altered. His personality is quite shocking as well. Geary makes light of the fact that Fluke is such a pervert. It’s nice that the cast members can all find humor in the way this role is written regarding his forward passes at the women of Port Charles. Since Kiki is Flukes main focus in town when it comes to being suave with the ladies, he stated that Kristen Anderson took a little time to get used to playing opposite his character.
It seems as though things are going very well health wise and career wise for Tony. The fact that he didn’t walk away from his 36 year role as Luke is such a blessing to the fans. What would General Hospital be without Lucas Lorenzo Spencer anyways? We are very thankful the writers could come up with a story that could peak Geary’s interest and that is able to show his multifaceted talents. We look forward to seeing more of Fluke Skyping with Tracy, and for Geary’s full time return this October.
For the full TV Guide interview with Tony Geary (Luke Spencer/Fluke), please visit their website at www.tvguide.com
The newest rumor flying around the General Hospital fan media is that Elizabeth sees the dead… or not so dead. Rumor has it that she is either going crazy to think she is seeing people who have been thought to be dead, or she actually sees these people. Supposedly there will be three.
The question is, who could they be? Some names have been thrown out there and these are just a few the fans came up with… Jason, Ric, AJ. However, if one of them she sees is Jason whom we know is coming back to GH, (Billy Miller), it might make sense that the other two are possible Stavros and Helena. After all, Victor Cassadine needed Robin’s help to bring some Cassadine’s back from there cryogenic state.
If this rumor ends up being true, and Liz is about to see three people she thought were dead, who do you think they would be? Comment below with your guesses!
Fans are anxious to find out who in fact is Julian’s real mob boss but this story has taken the long road. They want to know who has Luke Spencer’s face. It looks like fans won’t catch a break any time soon, so don’t hold your breath because it is going to be quite a while before General Hospital reveals the true identity of Fluke.
According to Soap Opera Digest, Rick Hearst (Ric Lansing) is not taping any scenes for GH at this time. According to the article, Ric Lansing won’t be seen in Port Charles for a long time while. “With Ric in the Witness Protection program, a GH rep confirms that the character will be off the canvas for the foreseeable future.”
Soap Opera Digest also reminds fans that Tony Geary (Luke Spencer) is on hiatus for the majority of the Summer and is also not taping any scenes at this time.
With Hearst and Geary off the canvas for the next few months, it isn’t likely that Julian’s boss will come to light and be taken down without their presence. It looks as though GH won’t make this revelation until at least the Fall.
Honestly I haven’t seen this much hype over a General Hospital hottie since Antonio Sabato Jr. played Jagger Cates back in the 90s! S o here you go Nathan West fans! Some good eye candy to get you through until tomorrow’s General Hospital.
There is a lot going on in Port Charles right now, especially a lot of people coming back from the dead. Wives and husbands surprising their spouses with life after death. Villains are resurfacing and Cassadines are getting unfrozen.
Victor Cassadine is headed back to Port Charles… the one who took Robin away from her family in order to bring Jason back to life. He is frozen along side some Cassadines that Victor wants thawed out. He needed Robin’s help, and since Jason is her best friend, she jumped at the opportunity even though it meant leaving Patrick and Emma behind again.
It looks like Robin (Kimberly McCullough) will be accompanying Victor (Thaao Penghlis) back to Port Charles this time around. Earlier today, actress Kimberly McCullough posted a photo on Instagram of a script. Her caption reads, “Try to say something bad about soap actors. I dare you. I freaking date you;) this is one day people and only my scenes, not the whole script.”
As this story line involving Luke Spencer (or someone who looks like Luke actually) is unfolding, many speculations have been made as to who the impostor or Fluke, if you will, could possibly be. We have heard over and over the endless possibilities including Bill Eckert, (Luke’s cousin), Jerry Jacks, Frank Smith, Johnny Zacchara, Anthony Zacchara, and so on. Recently, a new and fresh idea was brought to light after an episode of General Hospital that aired last week.
Jordan (the DEA agent), was talking to Julian Jerome at the gallery. Prying him for information, she questioned him about their “real boss”. Jordan let Julian know that she wanted to know who they are taking orders for and if he didn’t tell her, then she wouldn’t do her part in the organization. Julian shot down her request and warned her that if she knew who the “real boss” was, then she would be putting a lot at stake. He even warned her that she would be risking her own son TJ’s life. Jordan (being that she is undercover and knows the real risks) told Julian she was willing to take that chance. In their conversation she made a comment about how their boss was like the Wizard of Oz. He is there but no one ever really knows his true identity.
With that out on the table, fans have been picking their brains trying to figure out who Fluke really is. Some suggest that Jordan and Julian’s conversation was the writer’s way of giving fans a hint. How could we forget one of the most psychotic and memorable villains of all? After all, for must of us, he is still pretty fresh in our minds. How could we forget about FRANCO? Now, there is no solid information, again, this is just another speculation to the unraveling saga of the Fluke/mob boss story. In real life, James Franco played the Wizard in his movie, Oz the Great and Powerful starring Mila Kunis, Rachel Weisz, Michelle Williams, Zach Braff, and more. Some fans have tried to put pieces together with every single villain that ever crossed paths with the residents of Port Charles. Franco happens to be the latest.
Rumors in the recent past suggested that Frank Valentini wanted Franco to make another cameo appearance at some point. Other character related rumors suggested that Franco isn’t who he seems to be… that being said, this theory could be a viable possibility
What do you think? Could Franco make a comeback? Is Fluke really Franco? Comment below to let us know if you think James Franco could return and if you think Fluke could really be Franco.
SHARE if you think fans have finally solved the mystery.
It turns out that fake Luke, aka “Fluke” has a partner in crime. Let’s call Mickey Luke’s right hand man. Mickey is to Fluke as Jason is (was) to Sonny. He made his debut walking into the art gallery where Julian and Jordan were discussing their “real boss.” Lucky for Julian, he didn’t disclose that information to Jordan.
Mickey will be in charge for the foreseeable future as Fluke’s portrayer, Tony Geary is on vacation.
After today’s shocking outburst by Nina Clay, we are now aware that her sweet as pie persona really is fake and our gut feelings about her have been spot on. It seems as if Sam can see there is something off about her but Silas cannot. Isn’t that how it always works? The one who really needs to be watching out is the one who has the blindest eye. Not only is Nina playing Silas with her blessing for his and Sam’s relationship, but she also can walk, and well, she is CRAZY!
She has been hated by most since her debut in the park, crashing little Danny’s birthday party. The writers did something right, we hated her, and we were meant to. General Hospital Blog gives a big shout out to actress Michelle Stafford for doing such an amazing job with her new character. Goal accomplished. Stafford has succeeded in making the fans loathe Nina.
What is Nina up to exactly? Is all this to get back at Silas for cheating on her 20 years ago with Ava Jerome? Some speculate that Nina was never even in a coma, but a mental ward. Some say that because we saw her wake up, that she was indeed in a coma. But that could have been an awakening from a catatonic state or a number of other reasons.Others speculate that her Mother is in on this entire thing and it’s payback time for a cheating husband. Rumors have been flying that Nina knows more about Jason Morgan than she is leading on and that perhaps they were in the same facility. She sure is prying Silas and getting under his skin when it comes to Sam’s feelings for Jason.
We now know that Nina has been watching Silas for months and that she was in fact the one to trash his apartment, not her Mother, Madeline Reeves. What does she have in store for Silas and Sam, and for Ava?
Keep watching General Hospital to find out what happens next!
Terms and Conditions
Welcome to General Hospital Blog!
These terms and conditions outline the rules and regulations for the use of General Hospital Blog's Website, located at https://www.generalhospitalblog.com/.
By accessing this website we assume you accept these terms and conditions. Do not continue to use General Hospital Blog if you do not agree to take all of the terms and conditions stated on this page.
The following terminology applies to these Terms and Conditions, Privacy Statement and Disclaimer Notice and all Agreements: "Client", "You" and "Your" refers to you, the person log on this website and compliant to the Company’s terms and conditions. "The Company", "Ourselves", "We", "Our" and "Us", refers to our Company. "Party", "Parties", or "Us", refers to both the Client and ourselves. All terms refer to the offer, acceptance and consideration of payment necessary to undertake the process of our assistance to the Client in the most appropriate manner for the express purpose of meeting the Client’s needs in respect of provision of the Company’s stated services, in accordance with and subject to, prevailing law of Netherlands. Any use of the above terminology or other words in the singular, plural, capitalization and/or he/she or they, are taken as interchangeable and therefore as referring to same.
Cookies
We employ the use of cookies. By accessing General Hospital Blog, you agreed to use cookies in agreement with the General Hospital Blog's Privacy Policy.
Most interactive websites use cookies to let us retrieve the user’s details for each visit. Cookies are used by our website to enable the functionality of certain areas to make it easier for people visiting our website. Some of our affiliate/advertising partners may also use cookies.
License
Unless otherwise stated, General Hospital Blog and/or its licensors own the intellectual property rights for all material on General Hospital Blog. All intellectual property rights are reserved. You may access this from General Hospital Blog for your own personal use subjected to restrictions set in these terms and conditions.
You must not:
Republish material from General Hospital Blog
Sell, rent or sub-license material from General Hospital Blog
Reproduce, duplicate or copy material from General Hospital Blog
Redistribute content from General Hospital Blog
This Agreement shall begin on the date hereof. Our Terms and Conditions were created with the help of the Terms and Conditions Generator.
Parts of this website offer an opportunity for users to post and exchange opinions and information in certain areas of the website. General Hospital Blog does not filter, edit, publish or review Comments prior to their presence on the website. Comments do not reflect the views and opinions of General Hospital Blog,its agents and/or affiliates. Comments reflect the views and opinions of the person who post their views and opinions. To the extent permitted by applicable laws, General Hospital Blog shall not be liable for the Comments or for any liability, damages or expenses caused and/or suffered as a result of any use of and/or posting of and/or appearance of the Comments on this website.
General Hospital Blog reserves the right to monitor all Comments and to remove any Comments which can be considered inappropriate, offensive or causes breach of these Terms and Conditions.
You warrant and represent that:
You are entitled to post the Comments on our website and have all necessary licenses and consents to do so;
The Comments do not invade any intellectual property right, including without limitation copyright, patent or trademark of any third party;
The Comments do not contain any defamatory, libelous, offensive, indecent or otherwise unlawful material which is an invasion of privacy
The Comments will not be used to solicit or promote business or custom or present commercial activities or unlawful activity.
You hereby grant General Hospital Blog a non-exclusive license to use, reproduce, edit and authorize others to use, reproduce and edit any of your Comments in any and all forms, formats or media.
Hyperlinking to our Content
The following organizations may link to our Website without prior written approval:
Government agencies;
Search engines;
News organizations;
Online directory distributors may link to our Website in the same manner as they hyperlink to the Websites of other listed businesses; and
System wide Accredited Businesses except soliciting non-profit organizations, charity shopping malls, and charity fundraising groups which may not hyperlink to our Web site.
These organizations may link to our home page, to publications or to other Website information so long as the link: (a) is not in any way deceptive; (b) does not falsely imply sponsorship, endorsement or approval of the linking party and its products and/or services; and (c) fits within the context of the linking party’s site.
We may consider and approve other link requests from the following types of organizations:
commonly-known consumer and/or business information sources;
dot.com community sites;
associations or other groups representing charities;
online directory distributors;
internet portals;
accounting, law and consulting firms; and
educational institutions and trade associations.
We will approve link requests from these organizations if we decide that: (a) the link would not make us look unfavorably to ourselves or to our accredited businesses; (b) the organization does not have any negative records with us; (c) the benefit to us from the visibility of the hyperlink compensates the absence of General Hospital Blog; and (d) the link is in the context of general resource information.
These organizations may link to our home page so long as the link: (a) is not in any way deceptive; (b) does not falsely imply sponsorship, endorsement or approval of the linking party and its products or services; and (c) fits within the context of the linking party’s site.
If you are one of the organizations listed in paragraph 2 above and are interested in linking to our website, you must inform us by sending an e-mail to General Hospital Blog. Please include your name, your organization name, contact information as well as the URL of your site, a list of any URLs from which you intend to link to our Website, and a list of the URLs on our site to which you would like to link. Wait 2-3 weeks for a response.
Approved organizations may hyperlink to our Website as follows:
By use of our corporate name; or
By use of the uniform resource locator being linked to; or
By use of any other description of our Website being linked to that makes sense within the context and format of content on the linking party’s site.
No use of General Hospital Blog's logo or other artwork will be allowed for linking absent a trademark license agreement.
iFrames
Without prior approval and written permission, you may not create frames around our Webpages that alter in any way the visual presentation or appearance of our Website.
Content Liability
We shall not be hold responsible for any content that appears on your Website. You agree to protect and defend us against all claims that is rising on your Website. No link(s) should appear on any Website that may be interpreted as libelous, obscene or criminal, or which infringes, otherwise violates, or advocates the infringement or other violation of, any third party rights.
Your Privacy
Please read Privacy Policy
Reservation of Rights
We reserve the right to request that you remove all links or any particular link to our Website. You approve to immediately remove all links to our Website upon request. We also reserve the right to amen these terms and conditions and it’s linking policy at any time. By continuously linking to our Website, you agree to be bound to and follow these linking terms and conditions.
Removal of links from our website
If you find any link on our Website that is offensive for any reason, you are free to contact and inform us any moment. We will consider requests to remove links but we are not obligated to or so or to respond to you directly.
We do not ensure that the information on this website is correct, we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy; nor do we promise to ensure that the website remains available or that the material on the website is kept up to date.
Disclaimer
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, we exclude all representations, warranties and conditions relating to our website and the use of this website. Nothing in this disclaimer will:
limit or exclude our or your liability for death or personal injury;
limit or exclude our or your liability for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation;
limit any of our or your liabilities in any way that is not permitted under applicable law; or
exclude any of our or your liabilities that may not be excluded under applicable law.
The limitations and prohibitions of liability set in this Section and elsewhere in this disclaimer: (a) are subject to the preceding paragraph; and (b) govern all liabilities arising under the disclaimer, including liabilities arising in contract, in tort and for breach of statutory duty.
As long as the website and the information and services on the website are provided free of charge, we will not be liable for any loss or damage of any nature.