Peter August (Wes Ramsey) doesn’t miss a beat when it comes to covering his tracks or taking care of a situation he feels he doesn’t have complete control over. After his encounter with Robert Scorpio (Tristan Rogers) at Anna Devane (Finola Hughes) and Finn’s (Michael Easton) house for Violet’s (Jophielle Love) birthday party, Peter made a cryptic phone call. Peter is suspicious of Robert and has a feeling Robert will be a problem in the near future. Peter’s focus is keeping up with his lies, which means Robert is in his way. Peter was successful in rattling DA Scorpio, however, General Hospital rumors claim Peter won’t be ahead in the game for too long.
Robert answered a phone call and received news that his long time love and friend is dead. Robert went straight to Anna with the news of Holly Sutton’s (Emma Samms) death. Robert, Anna, and Holly have a great deal of history together
General Hospital fans can’t help but wonder, who is Peter calling? Who does Peter have in his back pocket, in high places, and able to carry out his dirty work? General Hospital rumors have been claiming different theories to figure out who Peter is working with. Anna’s sister, Alex could definitely be the person on the other end of Peter’s phone, helping him keep up this charade which is deceiving the people of Port Charles, including his loved ones. Cesar Faison (Anders Hove) has been rumored to be alive and helping his son, Peter carry out his sinister mission.
General Hospital spoilers and previews reveal there is an upcoming shocking plot twist involving Peter’s exposure. Previously, General Hospital Blog reported GH rumors and spoilers involving Dr. Obrecht (Kathleen Gati) finding evidence that could lead to her exoneration and clear Sam Morgan’s (Kelly Monaco) name as well. Liesl Obrecht has been arrested for the murder of Drew Cain (Billy Miller) but was framed by Peter. If Drew Cain is found alive, Dr. Obrecht and Sam Morgan will be able to live their lives freely, providing full redemption for these two woman Peter tried to railroad.
General Hospital rumors are flying after Robert received the news about Holly. It’s likely that whoever Peter has been calling and working with has set up just exactly what Peter wanted- a distraction for DA Scorpio. But is Holly actually dead? It’s quite possible that she is dead, but Holly has been such an iconic character that it wouldn’t make much sense for the character to be killed off, off-screen.
Some General Hospital spoilers suggest Holly Sutton and Drew Cain will turn up alive, which would completely blow up Peter’s plan to go on living his lie while letting Sam and Liesl take the fall.
Will Emma Samms and Billy Miller return to General Hospital to tie up the loose ends of this Peter saga?
Lucas Lorenzo Spencer as we know him is gone. So far gone that he is unrecognizable to his daughter Lulu Falconeri, and his love, Tracy Quartermaine. The two most important women in Luke’s life are at a loss, not knowing what has come over the ones loving, sincere man they once knew.
Lulu and Tracy had their hopes high with the idea of being able to blame Helena Cassadine for Luke’s 180 in his personality. For the past year, he has been acting like a completely different person, so much so that his loved ones and residents of PC actually began to believe that Luke WAS another person. When Faison turned out to be just a decoy so that Fluke could continue on withreeking havoc on the city of PC, everyone was convinced that Helena had perform mind conditioning on Luke, as she had done on Jake Doe (Jason Morgan). Lulu did not want to face the conclusion that her adoring father had actually tried to kill her and everyone he/they care about. She and Tracy needed someone to blame for Luke’s behavior and they had their minds set on Luke’s arch enemy, Helena.
When it turned out that Jake Doe was found to have a microchip in his brain as Helena disclosed, Luke however did not. As of now, there is no reason to believe that Helena has used a microchip to control Luke Spencer. That doesn’t mean that it ends there. As Tracy told Luke today, it is clear that there is much more to this than Luke is leading on. He claims these acts are his and his alone. That the way he treated his daughter, Tracy, and wanting what Sonny has has been in him this whole time, and that he just now figured out how to TAKE all the power.
Just as we as fans and the characters of GH thought that had this Fluke mystery all figured out, we encountered yet another setback. The story feels like a never ending mystery and many fans are ready to through their hands in the air and give up trying to solve it. Hopefully it won’t be much longer until Tracy, Lulu, Nikolas, or whoever has the power to get to the bottom of this does just that.
What do you think is really going on with Luke Spencer? Since he is NOT an impostor, and Helena claims she is not controlling him, what could have happened? Did the drugs he was given in Miscavige effect his brain this severely? Will we ever get our beloved Luke back? Will Lulu get to see her dad enjoy his grandson Rocco when this is all over? We will just have to stick it out a little longer and watch it all unfold in upcoming episodes of General Hospital.
Port Charles’ John Doe patient, “Jake” has been walking around the city and getting acquainted with people he was once very close with, as Jason Morgan (Billy Miller). Jake had no idea who he really was, and then one day, Helena Cassadine (Constance Towers) strolls along and decided to clue him in on her diabolical plan to control his mind. At that moment, Jake learns that he is Jason Morgan and that he and Liz Webber (Rebecca Herbst) share a son that has passed away, and that he is currently married to Sam Morgan (Kelly Monaco), and has a son, Danny (Corbin and Caden Rothwither). The catch was though, that now Jason doesn’t remember Helena said that at all because of her extreme mind conditioning.
Helena is using Jason’s impeccable skills as a body guard/hit-man to her advantage. She has him controlled, that when she gives him a job to do, he goes out to perform her request, and when he is done, he cannot remember that he engaged in those events. His first task was to distract the PCPD so that she could help Cesar Faison escape from police custody. In order to do that, Jake had to grab Sam and hold her hostage so that Anna, Dante, and Nathan were more focused on saving Sam, than what was going on in the background with Faison. Helena’s plan was successful and Faison was able to go free.
However, Jake may not be so lucky. Sam is a private investigator and has great instincts. In her quest to find the man that helped Faison go free, she realized that the voice of the man was a perfect match to Jake. He also said the exact same thing to her in casual conversation as he did when he was under Helena’s control. He said, “it’s not like I haven’t got all day.” Those words in combination with the sound of his voice rings clear to Sam, but of course, no one really believes her. Especially Elizabeth. Sam approached Liz with her theory and Liz basically told Sam to get lost.
General Hospital previews show that Sam confronts Jason aka Jake regarding the hostage situation. Will she get anywhere with him? Since he doesn’t remember doing it, and he has no idea he is really capable of pulling it off, he will most likely wonder why in the world Sam would accuse him of such a thing. Or perhaps it will jog his memory a bit causing him to have brief flashbacks. How do you think Jason will react to Sam’s accusation?
For almost a year, General Hospital fans have been battling with their brains, (and the writing team over at GH), trying to wrap their heads around this entire ‘Fluke’ story line. For many months there have been General Hospital rumors and speculations in regard to who is impersonating Luke Spencer. We the audience know that Helena has him locked up, has had him kept away from his family and loved ones, and he has been continuously drugged.
GH rumors have pointed the finger at many past and present characters and villains. Bill Eckert, Cesar Faison (which we know now was only a decoy), Jerry Jacks, Anthony Zacchara, Larry Ashton, to name a few. Still, there are too many holes in those theories for the vast majority of the fans to settle on one.
When Faison was in the interrogation room with Anna, he brought up Helena and how the two of them kidnapped Lucky and tried to condition his mind. Why did he bring that up? There is reason to believe that it was more than just to torment Anna with the possibility of her being under his spell and fall in love with him. Anna knows better. He tried that with her in the past, and it didn’t work. Faison went on to question whether or not Helena has perfected the art of mind control. This entire back story about Lucky gives good reason to believe that Helena is up to some old tricks.
What if ‘Fluke’ doesn’t actually exist? In the physical sense that is. Perhaps Helena has in fact perfected her art of mind control. We have seen the result of her conditioning so far in Jason Morgan. She tells him what to do and he goes out and does it. He later forgets that a certain series of events ever took place, and he forgets that Helena was ever involved. Now, that being said, what if Fluke is all in Luke’s head? Earlier in the year, when Fake Luke was acting “off” in Port Charles, that could have been because Helena’s mind control still needed a little work. Now that Fluke is back, and acting more like Luke than before, it’s possible that Helena just needed some more time to perfect her hold on Luke Spencer’s mind.
It’s entirely probable that Luke Spencer takes orders from Helena, and doesn’t remember what he has done once his tasks are through. Could Luke have an alter personality due to Helena’s mind control? At this point in the story, anything is possible, even playing around with the idea that Fake Luke isn’t another person at all. Is Fluke just Luke under Helena’s mind control?
Weigh in and let General Hospital Blog know what you think about this theory.
Social media ran wild today as Kelly Thiebaud aired her last episode as Dr. Britt(a) Westbourne, aka The Britch. Daughter of iconic villain, Cesar Faison, and the eccentric Dr. Liesl Obrecht, Britta was one of a kind. A coniving little Britch but with a soft heart when it came to a certain few. The ones that truly brought out the good in her were Nikolas Cassadine, his son Spencer, and we got to see that she could actually be nice to someone when she was with her pal, Brad. Britt did a lot of damage around PC including meddling in and disrupting the lives of Patrick Drake, his wife Robin, daughter Emma, and her fellow co worker, Sabrina Santiago.
Today on General Hospital, Britta left Port Charles with her father, Cesar Faison. Dr. O stayed behind to look after her son and Britt’s brother, Nathan West.
After the airing of her last performance on General Hospital, Kelly Thiebaud sent out a heartfelt message to fans via Twitter and Instagram. Check out what she has to say to all her fans.
Back in early November, it was confirmed that Kelly Thiebaud will be off of her contract with ABC’s General Hospital. The actress has gone from contract to recurring status with the 51 year old daytime drama. More recently, there has been rumors that Kelly’s character, Dr. Britt Westbourne will be leaving the canvas altogether.
From the looks of the onscreen evidence, it seems to be that the General Hospital rumors regarding Britt’s departure from Port Charles is actually true. Britt is leaving town with her father, Cesar Faison, after Nikolas found out about her scheme with Spencer to get back into Nikolas’ heart. Helena was helping Dr. Obrecht and Faison out of town, and Obrecht was bringing Britta along with her. But when Nathan got shot, Dr. O decided to stay to keep watch over her precious son.
Keep checking back with GH Blog for more info regarding comings and goings and the status of your favorite GH actors.
General Hospital’s week came to close with a bang after all the crazy events that happened to the residents of Port Charles. Who would have ever thought that Helena would be the one to tell “Jake” he is really Jason Morgan? And it was so easy! There wasn’t any hesitiation or beating around the bush. No interruptions, and no lies. It was as straight forward as you could possibly get. Helena told Jake he was actually Jason Morgan, that he is a dear friend to Robin Scorpio Drake, and that he is married to Sam and that Danny is his son.
But of course, there was a catch. Especially with “The Queen of the Damned” herself, Helena Cassadine. After divulging the truth and information Jason of his true identity, the ease of the entire truth came to a screeching hault. Helena told Jason that he worked for her, meaning she has conditioned his mind to obey her commands and not remember that she has anything to do with his behaviors. Helena wants Jason to work for her because of his extraordinary skills in the mob enforcement industry. She knows how valuable he is and wants him all to herself.
What was once so seemingly simple quickly turned into a very complicated situation for Jason. Sure, Helena told him who he was and who his loved ones are, but he isn’t going to remember her telling him this. Helena mentioned that she had a job for him under his newly conditioned mind. At the end of the episode on General Hospital’s Cliffhanger Friday, someone grabbed Sam from behind while she was watching Faison get moved into lockup at he PCPD. General Hospital rumors suggest that the masked man who grabbed Sam is none other than her own husband, Jason Morgan. Under Helena’s orders, maybe the job she had for her new employee was to kidnap his own wife.
What do you think? Will this GH rumor turn out to be true? Did Helena order Jason to kidnap Sam? Let us know by leaving comments below.
Anyone who has seen Thursday’s episode of General Hospital could agree that the scenes with Anders Hove (Cesar Faison), Jason Thompson (Dr. Patrick Drake), and Kelly Monaco (Samantha Morgan), were nothing short of intense. Others will describe the scenes as extremely emotional. Kelly Monaco killed it with her passion and obvious fury for Faison.
When Sam confronted Faison regarding Jason’s murder, it was easy to feel her raw emotion. Jason Thompson did any amazing job with just the look on his face. That look showed sorrow, guilt, fear, and shame all in those two eyes of his. Patrick looked as though he had lost his best friend and it was all his fault.
What will happen when Sam finds out straight from Patrick that he has known about Jason being alive for all this time? Granted, Patrick believes now that Jason is dead, because that is what his wife Robin, had to tell him in order to protect her family. Sam is going to have a ray of hope ripped right from under her after she learns that Jason didn’t die on that pier, but that he is now believed to be dead anyways.
Will Sam be able to forgive Patrick from hiding this enormous secret about her husband? After this fall out, is there any hope to save their friendship? Let us know what you think by commenting below.
Our suspicions were correct. After the reveal of Faison wearing Luke’s mask, many General Hospital rumors started circulating, one being that there were actually three, yes count them, three Luke Spencer’s. Well technicall, two fake Lukes, and one real deal. We all know there is only one Lucas Lorenzo Spencer, but no one every suspected that Fluke would have a sidekick.
Did we really think it would be so easy for Alexis to go into Miscavige and rescue Luke no questions asked? There were no obstacles, no one standing in her way. And since Luke (the real one) had been so heavily drugged, it was definitely a little odd when he seemed to have all his faculties. Fluke is doing a a better job this time around, playing the doting father and grandfather, playing into Tracy’s vulernability and guilt, and even calling Anna, “Slim.” He hadn’t however, called Lulu, “cupcake,” and that might be one nickname that only the real Luke would think of using for his daughter he loves so dearly.
So who has actually been pretending to be Luke Spencer? Is Helena involved? The  mystery of Fluke’s true identity continues to weigh on our minds. Who do you think is behind it all?
It has been a long time since the residents of Port Charles have seen this man’s face. It has been confirmed that the father of Ned Ashton (Wally Kurth), Larry Ashton, played by Hugo Napier will be returning to the canvas very soon. Tracy Quartermaine (Jane Elliot) and her son Ned are taken by surprise when Larry returns to PC.
Hugo Napier stepped onto the GH canvas back in 1988. Back then, he was out for treasure and Tracy was the same black mailing money woman she is today. She blackmailed the father of her son to give her and Ned a piece of the pie when he had his hands on the treasure. Unfortunately, things didn’t work out the way Ashton planned and he left town.
In 1991, Larry Ashton returned to Port Charles and work along side Harlan Barrett and Cesar Faison. Needless to say, they were up to no good. Tracy was a pawn in their game of trying to take over ELQ. Paul Hornsby was to marry Tracy in order to gain control of the Quartermaine family company. Fortunately for the Quartermaine’s, their plan was unsuccessful.
General Hospital spoilers reveal that Hugo Napier will be returning to General Hospital to reprise his role as Larry Ashton. As if Tracy didn’t have enough going on in her life right now as she is trying to figure out what is going on with her current husband, or the man she thinks is her husband, Luke (not Luke) Spencer, Larry Ashton decides to stroll on in.
With such ties to Cesar Faison and Harlan Barrett, could Larry Ashton have something to do with fake Luke?
It is uncertain at this time as to when Larry Ashton will make his debut in Port Charles. General Hospital Blog will keep fans updated on Hugo Napier’s status with General Hospital.
Terms and Conditions
Welcome to General Hospital Blog!
These terms and conditions outline the rules and regulations for the use of General Hospital Blog's Website, located at https://www.generalhospitalblog.com/.
By accessing this website we assume you accept these terms and conditions. Do not continue to use General Hospital Blog if you do not agree to take all of the terms and conditions stated on this page.
The following terminology applies to these Terms and Conditions, Privacy Statement and Disclaimer Notice and all Agreements: "Client", "You" and "Your" refers to you, the person log on this website and compliant to the Company’s terms and conditions. "The Company", "Ourselves", "We", "Our" and "Us", refers to our Company. "Party", "Parties", or "Us", refers to both the Client and ourselves. All terms refer to the offer, acceptance and consideration of payment necessary to undertake the process of our assistance to the Client in the most appropriate manner for the express purpose of meeting the Client’s needs in respect of provision of the Company’s stated services, in accordance with and subject to, prevailing law of Netherlands. Any use of the above terminology or other words in the singular, plural, capitalization and/or he/she or they, are taken as interchangeable and therefore as referring to same.
Cookies
We employ the use of cookies. By accessing General Hospital Blog, you agreed to use cookies in agreement with the General Hospital Blog's Privacy Policy.
Most interactive websites use cookies to let us retrieve the user’s details for each visit. Cookies are used by our website to enable the functionality of certain areas to make it easier for people visiting our website. Some of our affiliate/advertising partners may also use cookies.
License
Unless otherwise stated, General Hospital Blog and/or its licensors own the intellectual property rights for all material on General Hospital Blog. All intellectual property rights are reserved. You may access this from General Hospital Blog for your own personal use subjected to restrictions set in these terms and conditions.
You must not:
Republish material from General Hospital Blog
Sell, rent or sub-license material from General Hospital Blog
Reproduce, duplicate or copy material from General Hospital Blog
Redistribute content from General Hospital Blog
This Agreement shall begin on the date hereof. Our Terms and Conditions were created with the help of the Terms and Conditions Generator.
Parts of this website offer an opportunity for users to post and exchange opinions and information in certain areas of the website. General Hospital Blog does not filter, edit, publish or review Comments prior to their presence on the website. Comments do not reflect the views and opinions of General Hospital Blog,its agents and/or affiliates. Comments reflect the views and opinions of the person who post their views and opinions. To the extent permitted by applicable laws, General Hospital Blog shall not be liable for the Comments or for any liability, damages or expenses caused and/or suffered as a result of any use of and/or posting of and/or appearance of the Comments on this website.
General Hospital Blog reserves the right to monitor all Comments and to remove any Comments which can be considered inappropriate, offensive or causes breach of these Terms and Conditions.
You warrant and represent that:
You are entitled to post the Comments on our website and have all necessary licenses and consents to do so;
The Comments do not invade any intellectual property right, including without limitation copyright, patent or trademark of any third party;
The Comments do not contain any defamatory, libelous, offensive, indecent or otherwise unlawful material which is an invasion of privacy
The Comments will not be used to solicit or promote business or custom or present commercial activities or unlawful activity.
You hereby grant General Hospital Blog a non-exclusive license to use, reproduce, edit and authorize others to use, reproduce and edit any of your Comments in any and all forms, formats or media.
Hyperlinking to our Content
The following organizations may link to our Website without prior written approval:
Government agencies;
Search engines;
News organizations;
Online directory distributors may link to our Website in the same manner as they hyperlink to the Websites of other listed businesses; and
System wide Accredited Businesses except soliciting non-profit organizations, charity shopping malls, and charity fundraising groups which may not hyperlink to our Web site.
These organizations may link to our home page, to publications or to other Website information so long as the link: (a) is not in any way deceptive; (b) does not falsely imply sponsorship, endorsement or approval of the linking party and its products and/or services; and (c) fits within the context of the linking party’s site.
We may consider and approve other link requests from the following types of organizations:
commonly-known consumer and/or business information sources;
dot.com community sites;
associations or other groups representing charities;
online directory distributors;
internet portals;
accounting, law and consulting firms; and
educational institutions and trade associations.
We will approve link requests from these organizations if we decide that: (a) the link would not make us look unfavorably to ourselves or to our accredited businesses; (b) the organization does not have any negative records with us; (c) the benefit to us from the visibility of the hyperlink compensates the absence of General Hospital Blog; and (d) the link is in the context of general resource information.
These organizations may link to our home page so long as the link: (a) is not in any way deceptive; (b) does not falsely imply sponsorship, endorsement or approval of the linking party and its products or services; and (c) fits within the context of the linking party’s site.
If you are one of the organizations listed in paragraph 2 above and are interested in linking to our website, you must inform us by sending an e-mail to General Hospital Blog. Please include your name, your organization name, contact information as well as the URL of your site, a list of any URLs from which you intend to link to our Website, and a list of the URLs on our site to which you would like to link. Wait 2-3 weeks for a response.
Approved organizations may hyperlink to our Website as follows:
By use of our corporate name; or
By use of the uniform resource locator being linked to; or
By use of any other description of our Website being linked to that makes sense within the context and format of content on the linking party’s site.
No use of General Hospital Blog's logo or other artwork will be allowed for linking absent a trademark license agreement.
iFrames
Without prior approval and written permission, you may not create frames around our Webpages that alter in any way the visual presentation or appearance of our Website.
Content Liability
We shall not be hold responsible for any content that appears on your Website. You agree to protect and defend us against all claims that is rising on your Website. No link(s) should appear on any Website that may be interpreted as libelous, obscene or criminal, or which infringes, otherwise violates, or advocates the infringement or other violation of, any third party rights.
Your Privacy
Please read Privacy Policy
Reservation of Rights
We reserve the right to request that you remove all links or any particular link to our Website. You approve to immediately remove all links to our Website upon request. We also reserve the right to amen these terms and conditions and it’s linking policy at any time. By continuously linking to our Website, you agree to be bound to and follow these linking terms and conditions.
Removal of links from our website
If you find any link on our Website that is offensive for any reason, you are free to contact and inform us any moment. We will consider requests to remove links but we are not obligated to or so or to respond to you directly.
We do not ensure that the information on this website is correct, we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy; nor do we promise to ensure that the website remains available or that the material on the website is kept up to date.
Disclaimer
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, we exclude all representations, warranties and conditions relating to our website and the use of this website. Nothing in this disclaimer will:
limit or exclude our or your liability for death or personal injury;
limit or exclude our or your liability for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation;
limit any of our or your liabilities in any way that is not permitted under applicable law; or
exclude any of our or your liabilities that may not be excluded under applicable law.
The limitations and prohibitions of liability set in this Section and elsewhere in this disclaimer: (a) are subject to the preceding paragraph; and (b) govern all liabilities arising under the disclaimer, including liabilities arising in contract, in tort and for breach of statutory duty.
As long as the website and the information and services on the website are provided free of charge, we will not be liable for any loss or damage of any nature.
